From vmiklos at frugalware.org Mon Sep 1 03:21:06 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Mon Sep 1 03:21:07 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Distribution In-Reply-To: <221b.48b58dce@forums.frugalware.org> References: <221a.48b4ef8f@forums.frugalware.org> <221b.48b58dce@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080901012106.GD16514@genesis.frugalware.org> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 07:24:31PM +0200, richard wrote: > What I was tying to do, was to find a command that could be combined > with the output of 'pacman-g2 -Q' to download the source of all > installed programs. A simple 'repoman upd' as root should download the buildscript of all packages to /var/fst. If you really want to download the source tarballs as well, then you can write a short script for that purpose, or ask here for help, but it's really not that hard. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080901/51f03202/attachment.sig From vmiklos at frugalware.org Mon Sep 1 03:24:08 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Mon Sep 1 03:24:10 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Frugalware 64 bit and pluginflash In-Reply-To: <21f6.48ab7315@forums.frugalware.org> References: <21f5.48aabaf2@forums.frugalware.org> <21f6.48ab7315@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080901012408.GE16514@genesis.frugalware.org> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:27:50AM +0200, Marietto wrote: > gnash (debian, ubuntu, arch) works with firefox and konqueror 64bit...again youtube! and it's packaged. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080901/b0f5862d/attachment.sig From vmiklos at frugalware.org Mon Sep 1 03:26:19 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Mon Sep 1 03:26:21 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Frugalware 64 bit and pluginflash In-Reply-To: <20080901012408.GE16514@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <21f5.48aabaf2@forums.frugalware.org> <21f6.48ab7315@forums.frugalware.org> <20080901012408.GE16514@genesis.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080901012619.GF16514@genesis.frugalware.org> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:24:08AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:27:50AM +0200, Marietto wrote: > > gnash (debian, ubuntu, arch) works with firefox and konqueror 64bit...again youtube! > > and it's packaged. Oops, I wanted to give a link as well: http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/vmiklos/bmf/frugalware-i686/gnash-0.8.1-2bmf1-i686.fpm http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/vmiklos/bmf/frugalware-i686/gnash-kde-0.8.1-1-i686.fpm http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/vmiklos/bmf/frugalware-i686/gnash-nsplugin-0.8.1-1-i686.fpm You can open a task if you want to see these packages in the official repo as well. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080901/b39c2347/attachment.sig From vmiklos at frugalware.org Mon Sep 1 03:29:41 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Mon Sep 1 03:29:42 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: 2 issues with the latest upgrades In-Reply-To: <2208.48ad62c5@forums.frugalware.org> References: <60879.72.128.13.245.1219297033.squirrel@webmail.frugalware.org> <2208.48ad62c5@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080901012941.GG16514@genesis.frugalware.org> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:42:47PM +0200, mathieu buffat wrote: > "Hence I wonder how I can come back on the previous state of > frugalware (a kind of rollback) at least for the kernel to get the > wifi module work that is my main issue actually." Downgrades are not officially supported, though you can edit your pacman config, then downgrade each package using the output of pacman -Q and pacman -S --noconfirm. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080901/23b86cd4/attachment-0001.sig From zephyr83 at tin.it Mon Sep 1 14:18:48 2008 From: zephyr83 at tin.it (Marietto) Date: Mon Sep 1 14:19:38 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Frugalware 64 bit and pluginflash In-Reply-To: <21ed.48a8ef11@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2223.48bbdda8@forums.frugalware.org> ...I would gnash for 64 bit NOT for i686!! From malhzra at hotmail.com Tue Sep 2 18:54:42 2008 From: malhzra at hotmail.com (julian) Date: Tue Sep 2 18:55:41 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: KDE 4 Message-ID: <2224.48bd6fd1@forums.frugalware.org> hi, when i run stable with kde will it be possible to just update frugalware when it hits 1.0 and have kde4? or will i have to remove the old kde first and then update i know its far away but would be cool to know^^ From neverdream at gmail.com Tue Sep 2 21:05:00 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Tue Sep 2 21:06:09 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: KDE 4 In-Reply-To: <2224.48bd6fd1@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2225.48bd8e5b@forums.frugalware.org> iirc you can have both at the same time, but if i'm mistaken then pacman-g2 should handle the necessary steps to get you upgraded. -- ~ ~ :wq From tempo at marquo.com Tue Sep 2 22:05:57 2008 From: tempo at marquo.com (Taylor Buchanan) Date: Tue Sep 2 22:06:08 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Your new labour contract Message-ID: <251793920.86446428159934@marquo.com> Good afternoon, We have prepared a contract and added the paragraphs that you wanted to see in it. Our lawyers made alterations on the last page. If you agree with all the provisions we are ready to make the payment on Friday for the first consignment. We are enclosing the file with the prepared contract. If necessary, we can send it by fax. Looking forward to your decision. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: contract_n2.zip Type: application/zip Size: 18946 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080902/ebe934e3/contract_n2-0001.zip From neverdream at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 01:03:33 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Wed Sep 3 01:03:59 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Your new labour contract In-Reply-To: <251793920.86446428159934@marquo.com> Message-ID: <2227.48bdc644@forums.frugalware.org> Oh, goodie! Section 3 paragraph 4 is going to need to be re-written, though. The wording isn't very clear. :twisted: -- ~ ~ :wq From qatada_1 at hotmail.com Wed Sep 3 11:31:14 2008 From: qatada_1 at hotmail.com (Qatada) Date: Wed Sep 3 11:32:15 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Restoring grub after installing windwos XP Message-ID: <2228.48be595b@forums.frugalware.org> Hi! I have lost grub after installing windows.To restore grub normally i used to boot up with frugalware cd,create a folder and then mount on that folder using mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda7 /fru then chroot /fru then grubconfig The dvd which i have been using for boot up is of frugalware 0.4. The problem is now i am not able to successfully use chroot command.It is giving error fatal:old kernal ... some thing like this. Could any one please help me with this.Please let me know if there is any other way to restore grub.At the moment i have 0.8 version of frugalware. From nix.or.die at googlemail.com Wed Sep 3 12:34:01 2008 From: nix.or.die at googlemail.com (Gabriel C) Date: Wed Sep 3 13:27:10 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Restoring grub after installing windwos XP In-Reply-To: <2228.48be595b@forums.frugalware.org> References: <2228.48be595b@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <48BE6819.2010205@frugalware.org> Qatada wrote: > > Hi! Hi , > > I have lost grub after installing windows.To restore grub normally i used to boot up with frugalware cd,create a folder and then mount on that folder using > > mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda7 /fru > then > chroot /fru > then > grubconfig > > The dvd which i have been using for boot up is of frugalware 0.4. > > The problem is now i am not able to successfully use chroot command.It is giving error > fatal:old kernal ... some thing like this. This error is from glibc but that error is only in >=0.9* not in 0.8 > > Could any one please help me with this.Please let me know if there is any other way to restore grub As example download a recent netinstall iso , boot it , go to tty2 , and do what you are doing usually or read this : http://forums.frugalware.org/index.php?t=msg&rid=0&S=5e21e440b1e2896086e3d99335385857&th=1509&goto=8436#msg_8436 > At the moment i have 0.8 version of frugalware. Are you sure ? From ryuo at frugalware.org Wed Sep 3 16:52:54 2008 From: ryuo at frugalware.org (James Buren) Date: Wed Sep 3 16:53:56 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Your new labour contract In-Reply-To: <251793920.86446428159934@marquo.com> Message-ID: <222a.48bea4c6@forums.frugalware.org> Sigh... Forum spam. Perhaps we need new protection measures? From perbh at mailshack.com Wed Sep 3 17:23:06 2008 From: perbh at mailshack.com (Per Borg-Hansen) Date: Wed Sep 3 17:24:16 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Restoring grub after installing windwos XP In-Reply-To: <2228.48be595b@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <222b.48beabd8@forums.frugalware.org> Your mileage may vary, but when dualbooting I have the following partitions: /dev/sda1, 512 megs, ext2 /dev/sda2, 20 gigs, vfat (for windows) /dev/sda3, 2x memory (max 2 gigs), swap /dev/sda4, extended, remainder /dev/sda5, 20 gigs, 1st linux distro /dev/sda6, 20 gigs, 2nd linux distro ... My fstab has the following entry for the boot-partition: /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot ext2 defaults,noauto 0 0 If (for any reason) grub gets hosed, I boot up from a linux live cd (grml is my favourite) and run the following commands: zsh# mkdir /mnt/boot zsh# mount -t ext2 /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot zsh# grub-install --root-directory=/mnt /dev/sda This will install grub in the MBR (overwriting XP's efforts) and if need be I just fill in a new menu.lst (mind you, 9 out of 10 times it's still there): zsh# vi /mnt/boot/grub/menu.lst Reboot and everything is honky-dory again :) Per From neverdream at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 20:22:34 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Wed Sep 3 20:23:29 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Your new labour contract In-Reply-To: <222a.48bea4c6@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <222c.48bed5e9@forums.frugalware.org> /me grabs his shotgun :roll: -- ~ ~ :wq From neverdream at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 20:27:55 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Wed Sep 3 20:28:42 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Restoring grub after installing windwos XP In-Reply-To: <2228.48be595b@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <222d.48bed72a@forums.frugalware.org> Normally I boot the kernel from the dvd but I pass my frugal partition to as the root, like so: boot: default root=/dev/sda2 ro vga=normal and I just run grub-install /dev/sda After that, I'm good to go. The menu.lst can be changed later if needed. -- ~ ~ :wq From qatada_1 at hotmail.com Thu Sep 4 20:20:52 2008 From: qatada_1 at hotmail.com (Qatada) Date: Thu Sep 4 20:21:51 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Restoring grub after installing windwos XP In-Reply-To: <222d.48bed72a@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <222e.48c02703@forums.frugalware.org> Hi Groovy! I tried your options and i am able to login but gurb-install /dev/sda is giving some bios not found error. From qatada_1 at hotmail.com Thu Sep 4 20:39:00 2008 From: qatada_1 at hotmail.com (Qatada) Date: Thu Sep 4 20:40:05 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Restoring grub after installing windwos XP In-Reply-To: <222e.48c02703@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <222f.48c02b42@forums.frugalware.org> Hi Groovy! Your options worked.Thanks.I tried with grub-install /dev/sda1. From neverdream at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 01:47:20 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Fri Sep 5 01:48:12 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Restoring grub after installing windwos XP In-Reply-To: <2228.48be595b@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2230.48c07387@forums.frugalware.org> You want to run grub-install /dev/sda not /dev/sda1. -- ~ ~ :wq From kitsch at capaxdesign.com Fri Sep 5 02:09:03 2008 From: kitsch at capaxdesign.com (Garnand Streiff) Date: Fri Sep 5 02:09:10 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] ""Knut Day" in Berlin as ppolar bear cub goes public Message-ID: <9841239909.20080905000825@capaxdesign.com> Noble flower, because very, very few have beheld did its owner service as a garment of everyday permission to found the monastery, and also for deeply pierced with the straight shafts of bhimasena in all the divisions of duryodhana's army, it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080905/e1164294/attachment-0001.htm From neverdream at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 02:47:14 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Fri Sep 5 02:47:36 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: ""Knut Day" in Berlin as ppolar bear cub goes public In-Reply-To: <9841239909.20080905000825@capaxdesign.com> Message-ID: <2232.48c08192@forums.frugalware.org> Garnand Streiff wrote on Thu, 04 September 2008 20:09 > deeply pierced with the straight > shafts teehee :lol: -- ~ ~ :wq From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 12:25:42 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Fri Sep 5 12:26:49 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] usb Message-ID: <2233.48c1091e@forums.frugalware.org> Hi guys, I'm going to install frugalware on an 8giga stick. I followed the instructions found on http://frugalware.org/docs/install.html#_usb_image and installed (I tried) on /dev/sda1 which is where the USB is (/dev/disk/by-id). This is what I get bash-3.2# dd if=frugalware-0.9rc2-i686-usb.img of=/dev/sda1 58464+0 records in 58464+0 records out Trying to mount the device I get VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sda1. I tried to mount it using vfat, nothing With gparted formatted the device with a ext3 fs, repeated the actions.... nothing. Any idea? Thank you in advance -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 15:43:53 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Fri Sep 5 15:44:24 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: usb In-Reply-To: <2233.48c1091e@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2234.48c13798@forums.frugalware.org> gally wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 12:25 > Hi guys, > I'm going to install frugalware on an 8giga stick. I followed the instructions found on http://frugalware.org/docs/install.html#_usb_image and installed (I tried) on /dev/sda1 which is where the USB is (/dev/disk/by-id). > This is what I get > > bash-3.2# dd if=frugalware-0.9rc2-i686-usb.img of=/dev/sda1 > 58464+0 records in > 58464+0 records out > > Trying to mount the device I get > > VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sda1. > > I tried to mount it using vfat, nothing > With gparted formatted the device with a ext3 fs, repeated the actions.... nothing. > > Any idea? > > Thank you in advance I found the correct way to install the .img file. I had to use /dev/sda instead of /dev/sda1 This thread is closed, but I must open another one about another question, always on booting usb Thank you guys. -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 15:50:59 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Fri Sep 5 15:51:43 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] USB and menu.lst Message-ID: <2235.48c13942@forums.frugalware.org> Hi guys, it'a always me. :d As said in the previous post I found the correct way to install the .img file. I mounted it and found /boot/grub/menu.lst Inside there are the usual commands but I don't know how to insert these lines in my menu.lst. Ok... I can cut&paste them :d The problem is I don't know what root indication to pass since IMHO /dev/sda is built after the boot stage. So what kind of device have I to use? hdxxxx? Thank you in advance. -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From neverdream at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 17:13:24 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Fri Sep 5 17:14:08 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: USB and menu.lst In-Reply-To: <2235.48c13942@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2236.48c14c93@forums.frugalware.org> You should set your BIOS to boot from USB. If you must boot from grub, you want something like: title USB (Maybe) root (hd1,0) chainloader +1 But that'll only work if your USB drive is /dev/sdb, and if it is, it might not always be. -- ~ ~ :wq From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 17:40:18 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Fri Sep 5 17:41:25 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: USB and menu.lst In-Reply-To: <2236.48c14c93@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2237.48c152e1@forums.frugalware.org> [quote title=groovy2shoes wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:13]You should set your BIOS to boot from USB. If you must boot from grub, you want something like: title USB (Maybe) root (hd1,0) chainloader +1 It doesn't work for me since I have 2 HD with 4 partitions on each, so (hd1,0) in my case is a partition with music :) I tried other combinations (hd0,0), (hd2,0) but it doen't work. UFFFFFFFFF!!!! :) -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From neverdream at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 17:57:32 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Fri Sep 5 17:58:19 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: USB and menu.lst In-Reply-To: <2235.48c13942@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2238.48c156ec@forums.frugalware.org> It's very difficult to boot from USB with grub because the device name assigned to the device can change with every boot. You should set your BIOS boot order to boot directly from USB. -- ~ ~ :wq From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Fri Sep 5 18:12:25 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Fri Sep 5 18:13:28 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: USB and menu.lst In-Reply-To: <2238.48c156ec@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2239.48c15a68@forums.frugalware.org> groovy2shoes wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:57 > It's very difficult to boot from USB with grub because the device name assigned to the device can change with every boot. You should set your BIOS boot order to boot directly from USB. It works very well this way, I wont change :d Thank you -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From qatada_1 at hotmail.com Fri Sep 5 19:13:32 2008 From: qatada_1 at hotmail.com (Qatada) Date: Fri Sep 5 19:14:14 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Restoring grub after installing windwos XP In-Reply-To: <2230.48c07387@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <223a.48c168bb@forums.frugalware.org> I reinstalled windows and then insatlled the grub using grub-install on /dev/sda.It is working fine now.Thanks groovy. From eric.morre at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 18:27:58 2008 From: eric.morre at gmail.com (Eric Morre) Date: Mon Sep 8 18:29:58 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 Message-ID: <223b.48c5528d@forums.frugalware.org> Hello, I read some nice articles about frugalware and decided to give it a try. I downloaded CD1 and CD2 for the installation. Everything went fine until the "selecting resolution" part. Whatever I type in there for resolution and color depth gives a brief error and then gives me the same screen (selecting resolution) over and over again... My hardware (in short): - GA-MA78GM-SH2 mainboard (internal graphics radeon HD 3200) - Samsung Syncmaster 940nw (1440x900 60Hz) Anyone experienced this before? From neverdream at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 18:48:51 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Mon Sep 8 18:51:03 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <223b.48c5528d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <223c.48c55773@forums.frugalware.org> Do you have xf86-video-radeonhd, xf86-video-ati, and/or the proprietary ati drivers installed? -- ~ ~ :wq From eric.morre at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 19:44:08 2008 From: eric.morre at gmail.com (Eric Morre) Date: Mon Sep 8 19:46:36 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <223c.48c55773@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <223d.48c56467@forums.frugalware.org> Hmmm, the article mentionned quick responses on the user forum... They were totally right !! Great!! Can I install those drivers already? The Frugalware install isn't completely finished yet, it's stuck on that 'screen resolution window' in the installer... Maybe the installation needed a third cd, but which one? thanks! From neverdream at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 19:49:17 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Mon Sep 8 19:51:32 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <223d.48c56467@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <223e.48c5659d@forums.frugalware.org> You can skip that part of the installation and fix your screen resolution once Frugalware is installed. -- ~ ~ :wq From eric.morre at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 19:58:34 2008 From: eric.morre at gmail.com (Eric Morre) Date: Mon Sep 8 20:00:38 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <223e.48c5659d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <223f.48c567ca@forums.frugalware.org> thanks groovy2shoes! I rebooted but I m in a command-line interface... Maybe you also know how to install those radeon drivers from here? From neverdream at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 20:03:19 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Mon Sep 8 20:05:32 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <223b.48c5528d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2240.48c568e6@forums.frugalware.org> The same way you would normally: pacman-g2 -Sy xf86-video-radeonhd xf86-video-ati I've never installed the proprietary drivers before, so I can't help you with that. -- ~ ~ :wq From eric.morre at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 21:43:40 2008 From: eric.morre at gmail.com (Eric Morre) Date: Mon Sep 8 21:45:50 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <2240.48c568e6@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2241.48c5806c@forums.frugalware.org> Is this the right driver for 64bit architecture? I still cant see anything graphical on my screen... I rebooted but the only thing i get is a command-line-something where i can login, and then that's it. How do I switch to the Gnome desktop? (# packman-g2 -S gnome) so I suppose i have Gnome installed now? Why doesn't it display on my screen...? From eric.morre at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 22:16:06 2008 From: eric.morre at gmail.com (Eric Morre) Date: Mon Sep 8 22:18:07 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <2241.48c5806c@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2242.48c58805@forums.frugalware.org> OK, gnow is working now. I edited the xorg.conf with a nano command and changed the driver to "vesa". The resolution is far from 1440x900 but I have graphics. Just another question: does "pacman-s2 -S" work the same as "apt-get install" in Ubuntu? Or is there an other command needed to install things? I'm quite new to the linux environnement (switched from winXP 3 weeks ago) From iron at frugalware.org Mon Sep 8 22:58:49 2008 From: iron at frugalware.org (Krisztian VASAS) Date: Mon Sep 8 23:00:16 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <2242.48c58805@forums.frugalware.org> References: <2242.48c58805@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <48C59209.201@frugalware.org> Eric Morre wrote: > Just another question: does "pacman-s2 -S" work the same as "apt-get install" in Ubuntu? Or is there an other command needed to install things? http://frugalware.org/docs/stable/pacman-g2.html IroNiQ -- Member of Frugalware Developer Team Web: http://www.ironiq.hu LinuxCounter: #331532 From neverdream at gmail.com Tue Sep 9 00:39:27 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Tue Sep 9 00:41:30 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <2242.48c58805@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2244.48c5a99e@forums.frugalware.org> Rather than using the "vesa" driver, you want to use a driver meant to work with your card. Google is a better help in this aspect than me (a happy nvidia user :p ) -- ~ ~ :wq From davidwillis at hotmail.com Tue Sep 9 07:20:47 2008 From: davidwillis at hotmail.com (David Willis) Date: Tue Sep 9 07:22:30 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] virutalbox error after updating Message-ID: <2245.48c607aa@forums.frugalware.org> I updated to the new version of frugalware, but now I get an error when I try to use virtualbox. It says I should run /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup, but when I do that it says there is no such file. How do I fix this? Thanks David From mforce2 at gmail.com Tue Sep 9 09:52:56 2008 From: mforce2 at gmail.com (Marius Cirsta) Date: Tue Sep 9 09:55:18 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <223b.48c5528d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2246.48c62b53@forums.frugalware.org> I've had the same problem with the configuration screen appearing over and over again. You shouldn't worry however it usually works , you just have to quit when it appears multiple times. Also you can manually edit the xorg.conf file and don't use vesa , there's 2 open source drivers you can try. One is "radeonhd" and another one is "radeon". Put that in the driver category and see how it works for you. From davidwillis at hotmail.com Tue Sep 9 15:06:16 2008 From: davidwillis at hotmail.com (David Willis) Date: Tue Sep 9 15:07:37 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: virutalbox error after updating In-Reply-To: <2245.48c607aa@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2247.48c674c4@forums.frugalware.org> I got on IRC, and got it running. I just wanted to post this, so it may help someone else. I think it was depmod -a; modprobe vboxdrv (as root) that did it. here is a copy of the last of our IRC chat. was it the depmod -a; modprobe vboxdrv that did it? if it does not work again after a reboot then you just need to add vboxdrv to /etc/sysconfig/modules i think so, but that's just guessing From perbh at mailshack.com Tue Sep 9 15:41:14 2008 From: perbh at mailshack.com (Per Borg-Hansen) Date: Tue Sep 9 15:42:30 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <223b.48c5528d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2248.48c67cf6@forums.frugalware.org> I had the same hardware as you (though a different distro). The only way I could get decent graphics was to use the crystal driver (native, from ATI). Make sure you get the absolute latest (cant remember the version number), the 2nd latest doesn't work for your graphics adapter. I have a 21 inch Sony and with the Crystal driver (ie fglrx) and I can easily get 1600x1200 out of it. But - it was a slog ... no proper luck with 'vesa', 'radeon' or 'radeonhd', it _must_ be 'fglrx' From microwave_sintering at i.ua Tue Sep 9 18:36:38 2008 From: microwave_sintering at i.ua (dima) Date: Tue Sep 9 18:38:03 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] LXDE or Openbox in default install Message-ID: <2249.48c6a615@forums.frugalware.org> As far as xfce4 is an option to gnome and kde in net or dvd install is there any possibility to include lxde or/and openbox as an option during install? Both would save extra mb's during netinstall, and have at least different look from common top 3 (xfce4-gnome-kde). Because it is quit annoying to install just base and X11, then slim (edit slim.conf to fix xfce4 option), rc.d.4, then do xsession and then finally - enter lxde desktop. Anyway, thank you for your work :) :roll: -- YNWA From perbh at mailshack.com Tue Sep 9 19:22:40 2008 From: perbh at mailshack.com (Per Borg-Hansen) Date: Tue Sep 9 19:23:46 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] stable vs current Message-ID: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> at this point in time - ie with 0.9 just made public - is there now any difference between 'stable' and 'current' ? From priyankmg at gmail.com Tue Sep 9 21:23:05 2008 From: priyankmg at gmail.com (Priyank M.G.) Date: Tue Sep 9 21:24:21 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: stable vs current In-Reply-To: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <224b.48c6cd18@forums.frugalware.org> 0.9 stable is now a separate tree. Henceforth, updates to -current will not be reflected in 0.9 stable (except security fixes) . current is now sort of a playground for 1.0 ;) -- - Priyank [ Thou shalt never follow a null pointer for at its end madness and chaos lie ] From perbh at mailshack.com Tue Sep 9 22:55:09 2008 From: perbh at mailshack.com (Per Borg-Hansen) Date: Tue Sep 9 22:56:44 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: stable vs current In-Reply-To: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <224c.48c6e2ac@forums.frugalware.org> I realize such is the case - but I wondered if - for a brief moment when a new version is made public - they would be the same (ie compiler and libraries which are the most important aspect). I realize also that any updates after the 'public' date, they would be different again. From eric.morre at gmail.com Wed Sep 10 15:17:45 2008 From: eric.morre at gmail.com (Eric Morre) Date: Wed Sep 10 15:18:36 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: can't get the screen resolution to 'work' on frugalware 0.9 In-Reply-To: <2248.48c67cf6@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <224d.48c7c8f7@forums.frugalware.org> first of all, thanks for all the replies!! I tried to install the latest Catalyst driver 8.8 from the ATI website by typing sh ./ati-driver-installer~ and then the ati installer came up and I clicked the selected optionsfor automatic install. I did the " aticonfig --initiall -f " command and rebooted but no more graphics... anyone here can tell me how to install the ati catalyst driver 8.8 properly on frugalware 0.9 64bit? (I googled, but that didn't bring up any howto for frugalware; or does the same method apply to frugalware as on ubuntu 8.04?) (by the way, I hope it's not a problem to mention other distro's in posts? If it is, I'll modify my posts no prob.) Awaiting your anwsers. From devil505linux at gmail.com Thu Sep 11 14:58:11 2008 From: devil505linux at gmail.com (Devil505) Date: Thu Sep 11 14:58:50 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] frugalware-art Message-ID: <2250.48c915e2@forums.frugalware.org> Hi, The website http://www.frugalware-art.org/ is opened. Feel free to upload your Frugalware artwork stuff like wallpapers, screenshots... :) -- http://frugalware-fr.tuxfamily.org/ From carl at frugalware.dk Fri Sep 12 20:58:43 2008 From: carl at frugalware.dk (Carl Andersen) Date: Fri Sep 12 20:59:13 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Tips and tricks mayby? Message-ID: <2253.48cabbe2@forums.frugalware.org> I translate the newsletter to Danish just now and see this Quote: > How to determine the date of the installation of a Frugalware system? - submitted by 'VMiklos' > > There is a file, /var/log/setup.log which is created during the installation, but never modified. You can use the command ls -l 1. Will it not be a good idea to delete this file after an installation (if it doesn't destroy anything in the system) after have printed it out on a piece of paper. All code words are in clear text 2. How you find out about which version of Frugalware you use. Open a terminal and write cat /etc/issue And outputs are "Welcome to Frugalware 0.8 (Kalgan) - \l" Yes, I haven't changed to 0.9 yet -- Carl Andersen http://www.ligustica.dk/ | http://www.frugalware.dk/ | From mforce2 at gmail.com Sat Sep 13 01:36:18 2008 From: mforce2 at gmail.com (Marius Cirsta) Date: Sat Sep 13 01:37:11 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] error while creating file on fat32 parition Message-ID: <2254.48cafcf0@forums.frugalware.org> While trying to copy something to a fat32 partition I get this error : cp: cannot create regular file `/mnt/d/bla.bla.bla.foo.foo-foo25/CD2/foo.foo-bla.part49.rar ': No such file or directory. I find this very strange as it seems to work just fine with other stuff and even with CD1 of the same content. I'm using FW 0.9 and this is the fstab entry of the vfat partition which still has 80 GB of free space. /dev/sdb7 /mnt/d vfat umask=0 0 0 I know ext is a better choice in Linux and stuff like that but still , this error seems very unusual to me. Don't even know if it's a bug that's why I didn't open a bug for this. From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Sat Sep 13 11:21:04 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Sat Sep 13 11:21:46 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] run from desktop Message-ID: <2255.48cb85fc@forums.frugalware.org> Hi guys, is there a way to run a program via keyboard on the desktop? What I mean is run mc using e.g. Ctrl-z while I'm on the desktop? I already have mc on the panel, but sometimes I need to run it via keyboard. Thank you in advance -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From neverdream at gmail.com Sat Sep 13 21:16:38 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Sat Sep 13 21:17:29 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: run from desktop In-Reply-To: <2255.48cb85fc@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2256.48cc1195@forums.frugalware.org> What desktop are you using? Usually the shortcut to get a run dialog is Alt+F2. -- ~ ~ :wq From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Sat Sep 13 21:27:53 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Sat Sep 13 21:28:52 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: run from desktop In-Reply-To: <2256.48cc1195@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2257.48cc1438@forums.frugalware.org> groovy2shoes wrote on Sat, 13 September 2008 21:16 > What desktop are you using? Usually the shortcut to get a run dialog is Alt+F2. I know I was not able to explain my "problem" :( What I mean is the possibility to run a program, in my case mc, using the keyboard without using Alt-F2 or the panel or the menu. I wrote "desktop" meaning an area where I can use the keyboard without influence other running programs. Again. I need to run mc so I click on an empty zone of the desktop to get "attention" then I press the combination to have mc running. Hope this better explain what I need. -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From neverdream at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 00:20:24 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Sun Sep 14 00:20:46 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: run from desktop In-Reply-To: <2256.48cc1195@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2258.48cc3ca8@forums.frugalware.org> groovy2shoes wrote on Sat, 13 September 2008 15:16 > What desktop are you using? -- ~ ~ :wq From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 19:58:13 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Sun Sep 14 19:59:01 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: run from desktop In-Reply-To: <2258.48cc3ca8@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2259.48cd50b4@forums.frugalware.org> groovy2shoes wrote on Sun, 14 September 2008 00:20 > groovy2shoes wrote on Sat, 13 September 2008 15:16 > > What desktop are you using? > > Gnome, KDE, Xfce, something else? I use xfce. -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From priyankmg at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 22:02:32 2008 From: priyankmg at gmail.com (Priyank M.G.) Date: Sun Sep 14 22:03:35 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: run from desktop In-Reply-To: <2259.48cd50b4@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <225a.48cd6dd8@forums.frugalware.org> Open Xfce Settings Manager from the Xfce menu, and select Keyboard Settings. Go to Shortcuts tab and from there you can create a new keyboard shortcut to open mc. -- - Priyank [ Thou shalt never follow a null pointer for at its end madness and chaos lie ] From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 22:09:59 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Sun Sep 14 22:11:07 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: run from desktop In-Reply-To: <225a.48cd6dd8@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <225b.48cd6f97@forums.frugalware.org> priyank wrote on Sun, 14 September 2008 22:02 > Open Xfce Settings Manager from the Xfce menu, and select Keyboard Settings. Go to Shortcuts tab and from there you can create a new keyboard shortcut to open mc. It works. Thank you very much!!! -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From brdam at email.cz Wed Sep 17 07:40:42 2008 From: brdam at email.cz (Martin Burda) Date: Wed Sep 17 07:41:20 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Tips and tricks mayby? In-Reply-To: <2253.48cabbe2@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <225c.48d09856@forums.frugalware.org> ad 1) Yes, I was surprised too, all users passwords are included in /var/log/setup.log in clear text. I think it's not good security idea. From brdam at email.cz Wed Sep 17 08:17:09 2008 From: brdam at email.cz (Martin Burda) Date: Wed Sep 17 08:17:27 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Automounting devices in KDE (cdrom) Message-ID: <225d.48d0a0e2@forums.frugalware.org> Hello everybody, I have the following problem: CD isn't automaticaly recognized by KDE daemon (automount). I have ivman a pmount installed (maybe are some misunderstandings between these applications). Mount by hand or by desktop shortcut works fine. Line in my fstab is here: /dev/sr0 /mnt/cdrom auto ro,users 0 0 CDrom device isn't recognized in various applications (e.g) virtualbox) - that's problem for me. When I plug USB flash, all works fine. I'm using frugalware-current. Is any solution? From brdam at email.cz Wed Sep 17 08:40:08 2008 From: brdam at email.cz (Martin Burda) Date: Wed Sep 17 08:40:35 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Kernel module autoloading in virtualbox Message-ID: <225e.48d0a644@forums.frugalware.org> Hello, I have installed virtualbox 1.6.2-5 . When I try run some OS in virtualbox, I see following error message:VirtualBox kernel driver not installed. The vboxdrv kernel module was either not loaded or /dev/vboxdrv was not created for some reason. Re-setup the kernel module by executing '/etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup' as root. That's mean kernel module for virtual box isn't automatically loaded. I execute by hand as root this command:modprobe vboxdrv and all works fine. Is any way how to fix it, or is that bug? From zephyr83 at tin.it Wed Sep 17 18:08:29 2008 From: zephyr83 at tin.it (Marietto) Date: Wed Sep 17 18:09:09 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Kernel module autoloading in virtualbox In-Reply-To: <225e.48d0a644@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <225f.48d12b7c@forums.frugalware.org> I can try this: nano /etc/sysconfigu/modules now add vboxdrv From vmiklos at frugalware.org Thu Sep 18 15:29:24 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Thu Sep 18 15:29:27 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Frugalware 64 bit and pluginflash In-Reply-To: <2223.48bbdda8@forums.frugalware.org> References: <21ed.48a8ef11@forums.frugalware.org> <2223.48bbdda8@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080918132924.GJ4829@genesis.frugalware.org> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Marietto wrote: > ...I would gnash for 64 bit NOT for i686!! Is gnash a verb? :) I just uploaded an x86_64 version to my repo: http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/vmiklos/bmf/frugalware-x86_64/gnash-bzr9769-1bmf1-x86_64.fpm The same version on i686 works fine for me, tested with youtube. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080918/0e512935/attachment.sig From vmiklos at frugalware.org Fri Sep 19 15:52:05 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Fri Sep 19 15:52:07 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] stable vs current In-Reply-To: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> References: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080919135205.GJ20795@genesis.frugalware.org> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:22:40PM +0200, Per Borg-Hansen wrote: > at this point in time - ie with 0.9 just made public - is there now > any difference between 'stable' and 'current' ? At release time they are almost the same, with a few differences. The pacman-g2 package in stable updates packages from stable, and the same is true for repoman and the installer as well. There are no differences at release time. Since then, there are ATM 726 changes in current. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080919/b6890140/attachment.sig From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Fri Sep 19 23:39:35 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Fri Sep 19 23:39:37 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Exaile & m4a files, Message-ID: <2262.48d41c16@forums.frugalware.org> Hello, Start using frugalware since two weeks, coming from Ubuntu... Anyway, all good for the time being expect Exaile not being able to read m4a files; telling me the correct GStreamer isn't installed. Anyone know which one is it? And an other one, I have a USB multimedia hard drive, formatted in NTFS (to handle large file). I installed ntfs-3g to be able to write in it, but it's telling me it's set to be read only, any idea? Many thanks, :d From neverdream at gmail.com Sat Sep 20 18:57:34 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Sat Sep 20 18:57:52 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Exaile & m4a files, In-Reply-To: <2262.48d41c16@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2263.48d52b7d@forums.frugalware.org> You need the gstreamer codecs. You can install them all in one go like this: pacman-g2 -S --regex gst-.* as root. -- ~ ~ :wq From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Sat Sep 20 19:22:08 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Sat Sep 20 19:22:26 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Exaile & m4a files, In-Reply-To: <2263.48d52b7d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2264.48d5313f@forums.frugalware.org> Thanks, that was 79 libs.... Anyway it does work now. Any idea about the external hard drive issue? From neverdream at gmail.com Sun Sep 21 11:47:01 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Sun Sep 21 11:47:22 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Exaile & m4a files, In-Reply-To: <2262.48d41c16@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2265.48d61811@forums.frugalware.org> Simply installing ntfs-3g isn't enough: you also have to mount the partition as ntfs-3g, e.g. mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/whatever /mnt/whatever. I added the following line to my /etc/fstab to handle it for me: /dev/sda1 /mnt/win ntfs-3g defaults,noauto 1 1 -- ~ ~ :wq From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 02:04:39 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Mon Sep 22 02:04:52 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Exaile & m4a files, In-Reply-To: <2265.48d61811@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2266.48d6e116@forums.frugalware.org> thanks it did work!! many thanks again :d From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 02:08:08 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Mon Sep 22 02:08:04 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Help to setup Logitech Webcam, Message-ID: <2267.48d6e1e7@forums.frugalware.org> Hello, Me again, I would love to have my Logitech Ultra Vision working as well under Frugalware. the lsusb command give me this output for the webcam, Bus 005 Device 006: ID 046d:08c9 Logitech, Inc. many thanks for you help, :p From neverdream at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 05:12:40 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Mon Sep 22 05:12:39 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Help to setup Logitech Webcam, In-Reply-To: <2267.48d6e1e7@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2268.48d70d25@forums.frugalware.org> It should work out of the box on both -stable and -current. From what I gather, the module you need is uvcvideo, which may or may not be autodetected. Try a modprobe uvcvideo as root and then use any webcam app that supports uvc (I use cheese). -- ~ ~ :wq From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 12:00:21 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Mon Sep 22 12:00:58 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Help to setup Logitech Webcam, In-Reply-To: <2268.48d70d25@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2269.48d76cb1@forums.frugalware.org> No need to do anything, sorry to have post I was miles away to imagine it was working out of the box!!! Installed Skype and right away it worked... Thanks! 8o From riklaunim at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 14:08:09 2008 From: riklaunim at gmail.com (Piotr) Date: Mon Sep 22 14:09:13 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: stable vs current In-Reply-To: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <226a.48d78aa6@forums.frugalware.org> How stable the current repository is kept? Does packages are tested more or less before they hit current? :) From riklaunim at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 14:10:13 2008 From: riklaunim at gmail.com (Piotr) Date: Mon Sep 22 14:11:21 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Frugalware 64 bit and pluginflash In-Reply-To: <21ed.48a8ef11@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <226b.48d78b20@forums.frugalware.org> nspluginwrapper and Firefox doesn't work super-good. nspluginwrapper segfaults from time to time, but Opera32 and netscape-flash work rather stable on a 64 bit system for me. From neverdream at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 16:00:54 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Mon Sep 22 16:01:45 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: stable vs current In-Reply-To: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <226c.48d7a50e@forums.frugalware.org> I've been using -current for several months and have not had any problems. AFAIK, the developers also use -current. So, yes, it works well enough to use a main desktop (imo), but you can expect periods where a couple things might be broken temporarily. -- ~ ~ :wq From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 23:10:04 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Mon Sep 22 23:10:08 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] OpenOffice trouble, Message-ID: <226d.48d809aa@forums.frugalware.org> Hello again, I did set up OpenOffice like the documentation said with the integration of Gnome; pacman-g2 -S openoffice.org openoffice.org-i18n-fr openoffice.org-gnome However I have a lot of error showing in the terminal, and I can not press any touch within OpenOffice. Thanks you so much for your help, Here are the errors from the terminal: (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid (NULL) pointer instance (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_signal_connect_data: assertion `G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE (instance)' failed (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid (NULL) pointer instance (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_signal_handlers_disconnect_matched: assertion `G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE (instance)' failed (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: _gdk_xid_table_insert: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: _gdk_xid_table_insert: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: _gdk_xid_table_insert: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: _gdk_xid_table_insert: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1210 (1210) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1211 (1211) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1212 (1212) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1213 (1213) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1222 (1222) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1223 (1223) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1224 (1224) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1225 (1225) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1227 (1227) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1232 (1232) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1233 (1233) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_display_put_event: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1276 (1276) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1277 (1277) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1278 (1278) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1279 (1279) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 18 (X_ChangeProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1283 (1283) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 19 (X_DeleteProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1286 (1286) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging X-Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode: 19 (X_DeleteProperty) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No: 1287 (1287) These errors are reported asynchronously, set environment variable SAL_SYNCHRONIZE to 1 to help debugging (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_display_get_default_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: _gdk_xid_table_insert: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_display_get_default_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_settings_get_for_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (soffice:10310): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_display_get_default_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed (soffice:10310): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_xid_table_lookup_for_display: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed From neverdream at gmail.com Tue Sep 23 00:29:31 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Tue Sep 23 00:30:15 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: OpenOffice trouble, In-Reply-To: <226d.48d809aa@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <226e.48d81c4a@forums.frugalware.org> -> http://bugs.frugalware.org/ That being said, I don't have this problem on -current and OOo hasn't been changed since 0.9 release. -- ~ ~ :wq From neverdream at gmail.com Tue Sep 23 00:44:05 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Tue Sep 23 00:44:05 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Bugs - READ THIS BEFORE REPORTING BUGS ON THIS FORUM Message-ID: <226f.48d81fb5@forums.frugalware.org> The forum is not the place to report bugs! We have a bug tracking system (BTS) at http://bugs.frugalware.org/ so please report all bugs on the BTS and not this forum. -- ~ ~ :wq From nfbvdqanlkuv at bootsonline.com Tue Sep 23 01:01:09 2008 From: nfbvdqanlkuv at bootsonline.com (Ella Ayala) Date: Tue Sep 23 01:01:18 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] INNOVATIVE INCOME-GENERATION SYSTEM. You Ordered Message-ID: <01c91cdd$30de6080$590b5840@nfbvdqanlkuv> ====== INNOVATIVE INCOME-GENERATION SYSTEM Dear Customer, Order ID: 81183 Order Total: $59.99 Description: ''IIGS'' ====== We are sending you the Unique Income Generation Toolkit (UIGT) developed by the Institute of Innovative Business and Financial Technologies (IIBFT), which you ordered on 9/21/2008. Your unique UIGT activation code is: 821A0CC5-13 Please take a look at the instruction and get acquainted with the activation system, which is strictly confidential. Please find the list of the company?s addresses and phone numbers along with further information on UIGT in the enclosed instruction. Respectfully, Manager (IIBFT) Ella Ayala ====== INSTITUTE OF INNOVATIVE BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES Tel: 408-486-2000 Fax: 408-486-2200 ====== If you believe this message has reached you by mistake, please contact the support service via phone or e-mail provided in the same instruction. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Instruction.zip Type: application/zip Size: 31229 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080922/50b45668/Instruction-0001.zip From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Tue Sep 23 11:00:44 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Tue Sep 23 11:01:16 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: OpenOffice trouble, In-Reply-To: <226e.48d81c4a@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2270.48d8b039@forums.frugalware.org> Ok, you want me to report the bug? because i couldn't find it reported?! :roll: From vmiklos at frugalware.org Wed Sep 24 13:27:58 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Wed Sep 24 13:28:00 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: OpenOffice trouble, In-Reply-To: <2270.48d8b039@forums.frugalware.org> References: <226e.48d81c4a@forums.frugalware.org> <2270.48d8b039@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080924112758.GF23137@genesis.frugalware.org> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:00:44AM +0200, Sweetthy wrote: > Ok, you want me to report the bug? because i couldn't find it reported?! :roll: Yes, exactly. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080924/446d2ebf/attachment.sig From vmiklos at frugalware.org Wed Sep 24 13:30:49 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Wed Sep 24 13:30:51 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: stable vs current In-Reply-To: <226a.48d78aa6@forums.frugalware.org> References: <224a.48c6b0df@forums.frugalware.org> <226a.48d78aa6@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080924113049.GG23137@genesis.frugalware.org> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 02:08:09PM +0200, Piotr wrote: > How stable the current repository is kept? Does packages are tested > more or less before they hit current? :) Yes, we do some kind of test on them, but obviously testing is never enough. For example in case the upstream testsuite passes, we push the package to current without testing it for some days on our own machine. This way others can help with testing as well. In stable, most packages are tested for multiple weeks, and security fixes are tested for a few days in most cases. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080924/c44ac8d2/attachment.sig From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Wed Sep 24 14:20:47 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Wed Sep 24 14:21:13 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Re: OpenOffice trouble, In-Reply-To: <20080924112758.GF23137@genesis.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2274.48da309b@forums.frugalware.org> Alright, thanks it's now done :roll: http://bugs.frugalware.org/task/3357 Hope we're gonna have a bug fix soon, I really need OpenOffice :cry: From zephyr83 at tin.it Thu Sep 25 01:48:54 2008 From: zephyr83 at tin.it (Marietto) Date: Thu Sep 25 01:48:39 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Python Imaging Library: imaging = pil? Message-ID: <2275.48dad1e4@forums.frugalware.org> I see that there are two packages linked to Pyton Imaging Library: imaging and Pil. They are not installable togheter. I think that are same package (same version, same dimension). imaging: http://frugalware.org/packages/40318 pil: http://frugalware.org/packages/40703 From solidago_caesia at yahoo.fr Thu Sep 25 02:07:27 2008 From: solidago_caesia at yahoo.fr (Cassandra) Date: Thu Sep 25 02:07:25 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] unable to upgrade packages Message-ID: <2276.48dad63d@forums.frugalware.org> For the last two or three weeks, when I pacman -Syu two of the targets to be upgraded are fglrx_module-8.532-1 and fglrx-8.532-1. and I get this error: error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) fglrx: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so exists in filesystem I don't need fglrx and I'd be just as happy to be rid of it, but it seems impossible to remove without removing several packages--each of which would probably require removing several other packages. Any help on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated. From nix.or.die at googlemail.com Thu Sep 25 03:45:19 2008 From: nix.or.die at googlemail.com (Gabriel C) Date: Thu Sep 25 03:47:41 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Python Imaging Library: imaging = pil? In-Reply-To: <2275.48dad1e4@forums.frugalware.org> References: <2275.48dad1e4@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <48DAED2F.30602@frugalware.org> Marietto wrote: > > I see that there are two packages linked to Pyton Imaging Library: imaging and Pil. They are not installable togheter. I think that are same package (same version, same dimension). > imaging: http://frugalware.org/packages/40318 > pil: http://frugalware.org/packages/40703 Yes they are , looks like boobaa was sleeping when he duplicated that package :) boobaa please remove it since imaging was first in tree , thx From boobaa at frugalware.org Thu Sep 25 21:15:12 2008 From: boobaa at frugalware.org (=?iso-8859-15?q?CS=C9CSY_L=E1szl=F3?=) Date: Thu Sep 25 21:15:24 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Python Imaging Library: imaging = pil? In-Reply-To: <48DAED2F.30602@frugalware.org> References: <2275.48dad1e4@forums.frugalware.org> <48DAED2F.30602@frugalware.org> Message-ID: <200809252115.13472.boobaa@frugalware.org> 2008-09-25 napj?n Gabriel C ezt ?rta: > Marietto wrote: > > I see that there are two packages linked to Pyton Imaging Library: > > imaging and Pil. They are not installable togheter. I think that are same > > package (same version, same dimension). imaging: > > http://frugalware.org/packages/40318 > > pil: http://frugalware.org/packages/40703 > > Yes they are , looks like boobaa was sleeping when he duplicated that > package :) > > boobaa please remove it since imaging was first in tree , thx Done - sorry for my blindness. -- Bye, CS?CSY L?szl? (Boobaa) http://frugalware.org/~boobaa From zephyr83 at tin.it Fri Sep 26 00:20:52 2008 From: zephyr83 at tin.it (Marietto) Date: Fri Sep 26 00:20:36 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Identification Frugalware Message-ID: <2279.48dc0ec3@forums.frugalware.org> Sorry for my english :p I realized that my browser veb (konqueror, firefox and Opera) don't recognize Frugalware as my distro linux....they reported generally Linux. If I visit distrowatch.org I don't increse frugalware's counter. is it normal? :? From emilcim at yahoo.ie Sun Sep 28 02:15:00 2008 From: emilcim at yahoo.ie (Révész László) Date: Sun Sep 28 02:15:37 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] gramps problem Message-ID: <227a.48decc82@forums.frugalware.org> Hi! Has anybody ever tried this program from Frugal-package? If somebody has, had the program been working? Because if I launch it in terminal with command 'gramps', there is an error message like this: 'ImportError: No module named _bsddb'. Of course there are several lines before error message started with 'Traceback (most recent call last):' that I don't know they are error message or not. If I launch the program from the K-menu, it doesn't work. ps.: Gramps works on Ubuntu from Ubuntu-package. thanks for your help -- Semmi sem biztos. M?g az sem biztos, hogy semmi sem biztos. From palpi at mfp.usmc.mil Mon Sep 29 00:02:07 2008 From: palpi at mfp.usmc.mil (Szablewski Simunovich) Date: Mon Sep 29 00:02:17 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] World's tallest man gets married Message-ID: <9565348603.20080928220052@mfp.usmc.mil> New ccasinoo http://zev6vq.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pkqIlSTN7LCSJ2-3-RpNyBVDk_Rc5chRQJX1-dRtJOZeB2UeKrqw8kqmS1LGkEoVPwREsva5_qTUggmzlsErXww/u5ud27ew.html Will call a, could be seen by four people, two written about that. About the mother's unselfishness unwittingly, mademoiselle marthe told us the truth learn everything, and write me an excellent letter, 'ril. The nurse makes it for v in it. sir george. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080928/2ea37ef4/attachment.htm From vmiklos at frugalware.org Mon Sep 29 11:34:58 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Mon Sep 29 11:35:00 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] unable to upgrade packages In-Reply-To: <2276.48dad63d@forums.frugalware.org> References: <2276.48dad63d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080929093458.GN23137@genesis.frugalware.org> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:07:27AM +0200, Cassandra wrote: > For the last two or three weeks, when I > > pacman -Syu > > two of the targets to be upgraded are fglrx_module-8.532-1 and fglrx-8.532-1. > > and I get this error: > > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) > fglrx: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so exists in filesystem > > I don't need fglrx and I'd be just as happy to be rid of it, but it seems impossible to remove without removing several packages--each of which would probably require removing several other packages. What is the output of pacman -Qo /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so ? In case it belongs to no package, just do a pacman -Syuf, -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080929/f76c7a13/attachment-0001.sig From vmiklos at frugalware.org Mon Sep 29 11:40:20 2008 From: vmiklos at frugalware.org (Miklos Vajna) Date: Mon Sep 29 11:40:21 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: Re: OpenOffice trouble, In-Reply-To: <2274.48da309b@forums.frugalware.org> References: <20080924112758.GF23137@genesis.frugalware.org> <2274.48da309b@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <20080929094020.GO23137@genesis.frugalware.org> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Sweetthy wrote: > http://bugs.frugalware.org/task/3357 Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080929/13959a97/attachment.sig From sweetthdevil at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 13:20:40 2008 From: sweetthdevil at gmail.com (Sweetthy) Date: Mon Sep 29 13:19:59 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Logitech MX518 Setup Message-ID: <227e.48e0ba04@forums.frugalware.org> Hello, me again... Must admit Frugalware is really fast and pretty much easy to setup. Now the last bit is to setup my logitech Mx518 mouse to be able to use the backward and forward button. Any advice? From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 16:12:15 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Mon Sep 29 16:11:50 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] pacman clean Message-ID: <227f.48e0e23d@forums.frugalware.org> Hi all, I'ld like to remove old version of pkgs. I'ld like to use pacman -S -c but have a doubt. I've some pkgs which are excluded from the update (pacman -Syu) since the new versions dont work well on my system. What I'ld like to know is: is a check performed on pacman-g2.conf to read the excluded files or the "clean" remove everything old? My case. I've excluded Firefox 3.x and use 2.0.0.17. The clean command will remove the .17 version? -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us From solidago_caesia at yahoo.fr Mon Sep 29 16:27:58 2008 From: solidago_caesia at yahoo.fr (Cassandra) Date: Mon Sep 29 16:27:29 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: unable to upgrade packages In-Reply-To: <20080929093458.GN23137@genesis.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2280.48e0e5ee@forums.frugalware.org> Thanks!! pacman -Syuf solved my problem. From zephyr83 at tin.it Mon Sep 29 16:53:37 2008 From: zephyr83 at tin.it (Marietto) Date: Mon Sep 29 16:52:54 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Frugalware on Nettop: Acer One Message-ID: <2281.48e0ebf0@forums.frugalware.org> I have an Acer One with linux linpus. I try install frugalware (usb version) but after set language and keyboard I have segmentation fault error , so system reboot. Do you think make a frugalware version for netbook? From neverdream at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 21:05:59 2008 From: neverdream at gmail.com (Cory) Date: Mon Sep 29 21:05:47 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: pacman clean In-Reply-To: <227f.48e0e23d@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2283.48e12716@forums.frugalware.org> `pacman-g2 -Sc` will only remove old packages from your cache. It won't uninstall any packages. -- ~ ~ :wq From frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com Mon Sep 29 21:17:40 2008 From: frederick.cornwallis at gmail.com (paparucino) Date: Mon Sep 29 21:17:42 2008 Subject: [Frugalware-forums] Re: pacman clean In-Reply-To: <2283.48e12716@forums.frugalware.org> Message-ID: <2284.48e129d3@forums.frugalware.org> groovy2shoes wrote on Mon, 29 September 2008 21:05 > `pacman-g2 -Sc` will only remove old packages from your cache. It won't uninstall any packages. Your right. I used the wrong expression, but my question stays :p -- http://imageshack.us http://imageshack.us